SRT in GStreamer

Olivier Crête avatar

Posted on 16/02/2018 by Olivier Crête

Share this post:

Transmitting low delay, high quality video over the Internet is hard. The trade-off is normally between video quality and transmission delay (or latency). Internet video has up to now been segregated into two segments: video streaming and video calls. On the first side, streaming video has taken over the world of the video distribution using segmented streaming technologies such as HLS and DASH, allowing services like Netflix to flourish. On the second side, you have VoIP systems, which are generally targeted a relatively low bitrate using low latency technologies such as RTP and WebRTC, and they don't result in a broadcast grade result. SRT bridges that gap by allowing the transfer of broadcast grade video at low latencies.

The SRT protocol achieves these goal using two techniques. First, if a packet is lost, it will retransmit it, but it will only do that for a certain amount of time which is determined by the configured latency, this means that the latency is bounded by the application. Second, it tries to guess the available bandwidth based on the algorithms from UDT, this means that it can then avoid sending at a rate that exceeds the link's capacity, but it also makes this information available to the application (to the encoder) so that it can adjust the encoding bitrate to not exceed the available bandwidth ensuring the best possible quality. Using the combination of these techniques, we can achieve broadcast grade video over the Internet if the bandwidth is sufficient.

At Collabora, we're very excited with the possibilities created by SRT, so we decided to integrate it into GStreamer, the most versatile multimedia framework out there. SRT is a connection oriented protocol, so it connects 2 peers. It supports 2 different modes, one in which there is a caller and a listener (so it works like TCP) and one called "rendez-vous mode" where both sides call each other so as to make it friendly to firewalls. A SRT connection can also act in two modes, either as a receiver or a sender, or in GStreamer-speak as a source or as a sink. In GStreamer, we chose to create 4 different elements: srtserversink, srtclientsink, srtserversrc, and srtclientsrc. We decided on the client/server naming instead of caller/listener as we think it's easier to understand and it matches the naming we have to TCP based elements. We also chose to implement the rendez-vous mode inside the client elements as after the initialization, the codepaths are the same.

A typical example would be to have have an encoder which is also a server with a pipeline like:

gst-launch-1.0 v4l2src ! video/x-raw, height=1080, width=1920 ! videoconvert ! x264enc tune=zerolatency ! video/x-h264, profile=high ! mpegtsmux ! srtserversink uri=srt://:8888/

And a receiver on the other side would receive it with a pipeline like this one:

gst-launch-1.0 srtclientsrc uri=srt:// ! decodebin ! autovideosink

Using tools like gst-launch, it's very easy to prototype SRT and it's integration into real world pipeline that can be used in real applications. Our team at Collabora would love to help you integrate SRT into your platform, using GStreamer, ffmpeg, VLC or your own multimedia framework. Contact us today to see how we can help!

Comments (4)

  1. nh2:
    Jan 22, 2019 at 03:02 AM

    gst-launch-1.0 srtclientsrc srt:// ! decodebin ! autovideosink doesn't seem to work (any more?).

    Should probably be gst-launch-1.0 srtclientsrc uri=srt:// ! decodebin ! autovideosink

    See also https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gst-plugins-bad/issues/874 for various problems.

    Reply to this comment

    Reply to this comment

    1. Olivier Crête:
      Jan 22, 2019 at 03:00 PM

      Yes, the git master has known issues, they will be fixed before the next release.

      Reply to this comment

      Reply to this comment

      1. nh2:
        Jan 22, 2019 at 04:58 PM

        These the incompatibility of the commands in the post were also present for the 1.14 release, not only in master. But your reply below may already have captured that.

        Reply to this comment

        Reply to this comment

    2. Olivier Crête:
      Jan 22, 2019 at 04:37 PM

      I've just noticed the missing uri=, we've updated the blog post. Also in 1.16, we're merging the client & server src and sinks. I'll be updating the blog post to cover that.

      Reply to this comment

      Reply to this comment

Add a Comment

Allowed tags: <b><i><br>Add a new comment:

Latest Blog Posts

FOSDEM 2019 - Recorded presentations (videos)


From the latest on Open Source projects Zink (OpenGL on Vulkan) and VirGL (virtual 3D GPU for QEMU), to a state of the union on GStreamer…

A Panfrost milestone


Panfrost, a project that delivers an open source implementation of a driver for the newest versions of the Mali family of GPUs, now includes…

A dream come true: Android is finally using DRM/KMS


Released a few months ago, the Google Pixel 3 is the first Android phone running with the mainline graphics stack. A feat that was deemed…

Convincing your manager that upstreaming is in their best interest


In an ideal world, everyone would implicitly understand that it just makes good business sense to upstream some of the modifications made…

Metrics for test suite comprehensiveness


How can we measure the comprehensiveness of a test suite? Code coverage is the standard metric used in the industry and makes intuitive…

Gaining eBPF vision: A new way to trace Linux filesystem disk requests


A real-world use case of eBPF tracing to understand file access patterns in the Linux kernel and optimize large applications.

Open Since 2005 logo

We use cookies on this website to ensure that you get the best experience. By continuing to use this website you are consenting to the use of these cookies. To find out more please follow this link.

Collabora Ltd © 2005-2019. All rights reserved. Website sitemap.