We're hiring!
*

Kernelci.org automated bisection

Guillaume Tucker avatar

Guillaume Tucker
January 16, 2018

Share this post:

The next step in Linux kernel testing: automatically finding commits that cause failures to boot.

About kernelci.org

The kernelci.org project aims at continuously testing the mainline Linux kernel, from stable branches to linux-next on a variety of platforms. When a revision fails to build or boot, kernel developers get informed via email reports. A summary of all the results can also be found directly on the website.

Automated bisection

When a kernel revision fails to boot, while it is reported in the emails it is not always obvious what caused the problem. Development branches get typically merged with many commits on them, and only one boot test is run after the merge. So the initial information is that the main branch used to work, and after these many commits got merged it started failing. The actual problem can be very hard to track down.

For a given set of bad and good revisions, it is possible to run more boot tests while using Git’s bisection feature to determine which one to test next until there is only one left. Ideally, this should be the one that caused the breakage. However there are many subtleties that complicate things, for example there may be several changes introducing different problems especially if the initial range of revisions is very wide. Also, failures to build some revisions or false positives from the boot tests can mislead the bisection logic and land on a change that is not the actual breaking one.

So, does it work?

There is currently an experimental feature to automatically run a bisection for each boot regression found on kernelci.org. This will be started with the known good/bad revisions, on a given platform, in a given lab, with a given config. It is already starting to show some useful results, for example:

The main challenge is to bring the results to a high level of quality before actively publishing them. False positives in this area can be very harmful: if the bisection finds a change that is not responsible for the breakage, reporting it can be counterproductive. Developers may spend time chasing a red herring and lose trust in the reports. For this reason, each valid bisection result is currently manually verified, curated and shared on mailing lists or by contacting individuals directly.

Next steps

We’re now in a maturing phase, identifying issues with the bisection tool and improving it until it’s ready for production. This will initially target only boot tests on mainline and stable branches. Future improvements can include extending it to more kernel trees, bisecting linux-next against mainline and covering more functional tests beyond booting to a prompt.
 


Visit Guillaume's blog.

Comments (0)


Add a Comment






Allowed tags: <b><i><br>Add a new comment:


Search the newsroom

Latest Blog Posts

An easy to use MTP implementation for your next embedded Linux project

13/04/2021

Did you know you could run a permissively-licensed MTP implementation with minimal dependencies on an embedded device? Here's a step-by-step…

Rust: integrating LLVM source-base code coverage with GitLab

24/03/2021

Earlier this year, the Rust compiler gained support for LLVM source-base code coverage. In this post we'll explain how to setup a CI job…

Build and run GTK 4 applications with Visual Studio

18/03/2021

Over the past few months, I've been working on a side project to improve Meson sub-project support. The best stress test is to build projects…

New features, changes & improvements to KernelCI's UI

04/03/2021

The most complete automated testing and continuous integration tool for the Linux kernel continues to evolve at a rapid pace. Here's a look…

Asymmetric Multi Processing with Linux & Zephyr on the STM32MP1

03/03/2021

In the embedded world, many modern SoCs such as the ST Microelectronics STM32MP1 now include coprocessor cores which can be used for a wide…

Adding HEVC/H.265 support for NXP's i.MX 8M

17/02/2021

Our recent efforts on the Hantro kernel driver have resulted in the addition of H.264 decoding support and multiple performance improvements.…

Open Since 2005 logo

We use cookies on this website to ensure that you get the best experience. By continuing to use this website you are consenting to the use of these cookies. To find out more please follow this link.

Collabora Ltd © 2005-2021. All rights reserved. Privacy Notice. Sitemap.

Collabora Limited is registered in England and Wales. Company Registration number: 5513718. Registered office: The Platinum Building, St John's Innovation Park, Cambridge, CB4 0DS, United Kingdom. VAT number: 874 1630 19.